Reform, Reform, Reform

Posted on 16. august 2005 of the Philip Mann

Yet another article about "Patent Reform" today. To listen to some of these guys, do you think Microsoft, Intel, Google, and IBM's of the world is at risk of bankrupted by small patent holders.

In the event of you missed it the first time, let's try this again.

The patent law, is a property. The essence of a property is the right to exclude others. "Owner" my home resources can I keep the alien and don't want others to from living there. Have a right of the "legal" ownership means I can call on legal help system (for example, If a stranger in my house is significantly greater than I.) Also, if I take a chance and buy a house in a small, established within the territory, and a few years later, this area will be "warm" and I can now sell it several times what I paid for, there is something wrong with the intrinsic lighteres doing? (This is, of course, America ...) The law Should step in and force me to "rent" my home to any foreign, who wants it, or, worse yet, simply breaks in and take it? The law Should step in and force me to do it at reduced rates, when the alien is a billionaire and can easily Afford what I ask? Why should things be different when the property is a patent, rather than a home?

I do not know which of the proposed "reforms" to find the most distasteful. (There are so many good choice!) I think at the moment, the attack on the injunction is what galls me most. If you can not keep people from your property, what makes it either "your" or "property"?

The author of the topic article asks, "why you should care." You should, but perhaps not for the reasons he thinks.

When I was an engineer, I had no intention of spending my life with a large company. Like most of my peers, I had the dream of just learning ropes with an established company and then founded my own company around a new idea. Into a law school and a few other things kind of sidings, for a while, but I would like to believe today's young people still share that dream. If they do, I hope, they realise that strong patents and more importantly a legal system that will enforce them even against powerful interests, are some of the few things that could give them an even break. In the affirmative, they should, fighting these supposed "patent reform" tooth and nail.

Time will tell.

View the original article here

Reform, Reform, Reform

Published on August 16, 2005 by Philip Mann

However another article about "Patent reform" today. To listen to some of these guys, you would think that Microsoft, breach, goggles and IBM in the world at risk of being exhausted by small patent holders.

Where it was lost for the first time, try again.!

A patent right is a right of property. The essence of a right of property is the right to exclude others. "Own" my home media I keep strangers and others that I don't want to live there. You have a right of property "legal" means that I can call envelope legal help system (for example, if strangers in my house are considerably larger I am). Similarly, if you took a chance and buy a house in a less established area and a few years later the area gets "hot" and now I can sell it for several times what I paid, what something inherently wrong in this? (This is, after all, America...) Should the law intervene and me "rent" in my house any stranger who wants to, or worse yet, simply breaks in and takes it force? Should the law intervene and me to do so at reduced prices, when the stranger is a billionaire and can easily afford to what I am demanding force? Why things be different when the property is a patent, rather than using a home?

I do not know of, the proposed "reforms", I think most unpleasant. (There are so many good choices!) Today, I think the attack of injunctions is what me more galls. What if you can't keep people out of their property, which makes "yours" or "property"?

The author of the article object asks "why should care." You must, but perhaps not for the reasons that thought.

When I was an engineer, I had no intention to spend my life with a huge company. Like many of my contemporaries, I had dreams of learning the ropes with an established company and then forming my own business around a new idea. Law school and some other things kind of diversion for a time, but would like to think young fixed fee today that dream. If do them, I hope to realize that patents strong and, more importantly, a legal system that will enforce even against the interests of powerful enterprises, are some of the few things that could give them a break even. If so, should be fighting against these so-called "patent reform" tooth and nail.

Time will tell.

View the original article here