A personal injury attorney support Rochester aimed at curbing teenage driving accidents

Federal legislation introduced by his New York City to promote safety and responsible driving by young drivers, car accident lawyer Rochester says Scott c. Gottlieb.

Rochester, NY (Vocus/PRWEB) March 12, 2011

Rochester lawyer representing victims of personal injury car accident in New York said today that he supports the program sets a standard for States to implement national plans for a driver's license for drivers of progressive youth.

Two of his party, New York, reflective Kirsten Gillibrand Republican Tim Bishop, introduced the proposed federal legislation known as the enrichment of this week, and a solid defense for sure a novice driver or a stand up.

Among other items, the program calls for States to adopt the licensing process-stages, prohibit night driving and passenger restrictions and cell phone among drivers under the age of 18.

"As a personal injury attorney, I have seen the tragic consequences of crashes involving drivers experienced, young," said the lawyer's personal injury Rochester Scott Gottlieb c. Law Office of Scott c. Gottlieb & Associates, New York personal injury attorneys helping victims of car accidents and their families throughout the region.

"That is why I support all of the program to promote safety and responsible driving among young drivers, which carries the potential of reducing accidents and deaths, injuries, lmthrot," said Gottlieb.

According to the Center for disease control and prevention, car crashes are the cause of death among American youth. Per mile driven, ages 16-19 it is in fact four times more than older drivers to be involved in the accident, reported by the CDC

Between 2005-2009, residents of New York 280 died in car crashes involving drivers who were aged 16-17, while the 46,000 more were wounded, the office news release stated that Gillibrand refunds. Rochester-Finger Lakes region alone, there were 37 deaths 6,069 injuries caused by drivers of youth during the same period, said office of Gillibrand.

"Even though New York is one of the driver's license programs highest gradient, these numbers show youth driving accidents are still a problem," said Gottlieb. "So we need to continue to make efforts to improve the education and supervision of young administrators."

Law stand up, States are required to configure a driver's license process that includes three stages: interim permit students, and limited. Driver couldn't get the unlimited until the age of 18. (New York, a threshold current age is 17.)

During the students ' permit and intermediate stages will be allowed to drive, and the need for one night or more-family passengers under the age of 21 unless accompanied by a car and driver's license over the age of 21. In addition, beginning with visits by using cell phones and other communication devices unless there was an emergency.

The law also allows the Secretary of the Department of transportation to establish additional rules, including:
Necessary to the completion of 30 hours are controlled by the licensed driver age 21 and older; And Delaying full licensure for all teen was convicted of driving while intoxicated (DWI), reckless driving, driving without a seatbelt, passing quickly or trafic.

Act to authorize $ 25 million to help States to bmankim the new set, while countries that fail to implement it would lose their federal highway funding dollars.

"Although it appears that the program is very effective, even laws and completely eliminate youth driving accidents," said Gottlieb. "If a person is involved in the accident was caused by an experienced driver, it is important to contact an experienced lawyer immediately to protect the legal rights and options."

About the advocates of Scott c. Gottlieb & partners

Law Office of Scott c. Gottlieb & Associates handles all types of personal injury and medical malpractice cases, including cases of drunk driving accidents, car accidents, engines, misdiagnosis of cancer death in the brain, dog bites, hunting accidents, birth injuries, brain injuries, construction accidents, fall injuries insurance and settlements. The firm employs regularly accident reconstruction experts, researchers, photographers, and economists to help them evaluate and cases of personal injury. The firm has offices in Binghamton, Syracuse, Rochester, almira Watertown. For more information, call 1-800-TALK-LAW or use the online contact form.

# # #

Scott c. Gottlieb
Law firm of Scott c. Gottlieb & partners
(800) 726-5529
Information by e-mail

View the original article here

National drunk and Drugged driving prevention month begins today

Holiday season is a popular time of year, many people, and the last thing anyone wants for the holidays is tragic – especially on the drunk driving accident. If you want to prevent a heartbreaking drug or alcohol related to cars and car accidents, launched by the Center for disease control and prevention (CDC) national program, called the national drunk driving prevention month and, remembering, or "3D" month, "shortly.

According to the CDC, there are 36 fatal accidents caused by drunk drivers every day in the United States. In fact, the victim of an accident management falls almost one-third of all drunk levied against drug-related deaths in THE UNITED STATES, there are also driving drunk injuries in 700 accidents, cars, trucks and motorcycles each one day.

Unfortunately, the higher risk of an accident the driver drunk, when we celebrate the holidays. This year, accept, consider whether you can, however, reduce the threat to drunk and drugged driving.

You can do to Protect Yourself, your family and your friends from drunk driving

Hosting or attending a party where alcohol is served, to take effective steps to prevent drunk driving:

Keep in mind that the law of Alabama, social host and dram shop liability can include bars, restaurants and even the companies that host holiday parties responsible if their negligence contributing to the accident of drunk driving. If you are hosting a party personal or work-leave your guests specify sober to remind the driver, offer plenty of alcohol-free beverages, and pay attention to, if your guests leave, so you know that you are leaving with a sober driver. Don ' t worry to take the keys. One of the ways is a key stake at the beginning of the parties before any drink begins. Make that are controlled by the alcoholic beverages, so If you have access to participate in the party., make sure you can identify the driver and a backup plan in case your drive safely falls underage people.

Remember, approximately 1.4 million drivers are arrested for DUI annually--and the CDC says that the number of accounts for less than 1% of people surveyed who self-reported driving drunk.

DUI arrests and car accidents are at least a thing that may occur during the holidays. We all play a role in the prevention of these tragedies and promoting the safety of the driver, all year long. Have a happy holiday season!

Source: centers for disease control and prevention, "national drunk and Drugged driving prevention month"

Tags alcohol:, Car accidents, DUI, Dram Shop liability, Driver safety, drunk driving, drunk driving injuries, drunk and Drugged driving prevention month, fatal accidents, accidents motorcycle, Tips for safety, truck accidents, victims of drunk driving accidents, levied against Death

View the original article here

Who is driving the cost of process? (Or "maybe the recession's worse than we should!")

Home > articles > who the driving of the costs of the process? (Or "maybe the recession's worse than we should!")Posted on 12. February 2010 of Philip Mann

As to the quota-fee lawyers and alleged "patent trolls" to start, my colleagues and I blamed for many of the ills plaguing society.? It is, we are not the get paid unless we are successful--who file profit-slight cases prolong litigation, wasting resources and cause innocent defendants pay their lawyers up by two million dollars on average to defend themselves.? It is a strange we sleep at night.

These ideas brought an admittedly complacent butter my face as I received recent decision of Federal Circuit confirms Distriktsdomstolens denial of fees in case we handled that never should have gone for as long as it did.

Now, in fairness, we lost the case on the merits, District held the patent invalid and we took our lumps, which we knew we perhaps when we went.? No complaints there.

Not satisfied with their victory, our opponents are moved for fees.? No complaint as it is, again, their right to ask.

What I find funny is that our opponents have selected reject our early offer for a "walk away" settlement, chose to file a desperate appeal of Distriktsdomstolens denial of fees and--most amusingly--3000 miles each way to deliver a vain 15 minute oral argument against an opponent who was even there.? (We will be the wastrels, we were elected to waive oral argument and rest on our map.)

So there you have it.? A cost-based company will happily spend thousands of dollars of its client money to travel 3,000 miles to argue against an empty chair, but is it the guys who run contingent fee up the costs of the proceedings.

Yeah, someone should really do something about us.

View the original article here

That is driving the costs of litigation? (Or, "maybe the recession Worse Than We Think!")

Home articles algorithm that is driving the costs of litigation algorithm? (Or, "maybe the recession Worse Than We Think!")Published on February 12, 2010 by Philip Mann

As contributors to lawyers fees and so-called "patent trolls" for booting, my colleagues and I blamed for many of the ills that plague society.? Us - who do not pay unless we are successful - is merito-menos cases files, prolong litigation, resources, waste and cause innocent defendants pay their lawyers more than two million dollars on average to fend for themselves.? It is a wonder that sleep at night.

These thoughts before a sonrisita is true to self congratulatory my face as I received the recent decision of the Circuit Federal stating denial rates District Court in a case that we never should have gone in that did it.

Now in fairness, we lost the case on the merits, the District Court nullified the patent and then take our lumps as what we knew that we could when we went.? No complaints.

Not happy with his win, our adversaries moved fees.? Once again, any complaint that is their right to apply.

What find me amusing is that our opponents selected reject our early offer a solution "to stand", decided to a desperate appeal fee District Court's denial, and - most find - traveled to 3000 miles each way to deliver an oral argument useless 15 minutes against an opponent that wasn't even there.? (Us, being the wastrels we are chosen to waive oral argument and rest in our brief.)

Therefore, you have it.? A company headquartered in every hour will happily spend thousands of dollars of money from its customers to travel 3000 miles to argue against an empty chair, but it is that the boys of tariff quotas that are driving up the costs of litigation.

Yes, really someone should do something about us.

View the original article here